Introduction
When it comes to managing and organizing containerized applications there are two platforms that have emerged. Kubernetes and OpenShift. Both platforms share the goal of simplifying deployment, scaling and operational aspects of application containers. However there are differences between them. This article offers a comparison of OpenShift vs Kubernetes highlighting their features, variations and ideal use cases.
What is Kubernetes?
Kubernetes (often referred to as K8s) is an open source platform designed for orchestrating containers. It automates tasks such as deploying, scaling and managing containerized applications. Originally developed by Google and later donated to the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) Kubernetes has now become the accepted industry standard for container management.
Key Features of Kubernetes
Pods: Within the Kubernetes ecosystem, pods serve as the units for deploying applications. They encapsulate one or multiple containers.
Service Discovery and Load Balancing: With Kubernetes containers can be exposed through DNS names or IP addresses. Additionally it has the capability to distribute network traffic across instances in case a container experiences traffic.
Storage Orchestration: The platform seamlessly integrates with storage systems such as on premises or public cloud providers based on user preferences.
Automated. Rollbacks: Kubernetes facilitates rolling updates while also providing a mechanism to revert back to versions when necessary.
What is OpenShift?
OpenShift, developed by Red Hat, is a container platform based on Kubernetes that provides an approach to creating, deploying and managing applications in a cloud environment. It enhances the capabilities of Kubernetes by incorporating features and tools that contribute to an integrated and user-friendly platform.
Key Features of OpenShift
Tools for Developers and Operations: OpenShift offers an array of tools that cater to the needs of both developers and system administrators.
Enterprise Level Security: It incorporates security features that make it suitable for industries with regulations.
Seamless Developer Experience: OpenShift includes a built in integration/ deployment (CI/CD) pipeline, source to image (S2I) functionality, as well as support for various development frameworks.
Service Mesh and Serverless Capabilities: It supports integration with Istio based service mesh. Offers Knative, for serverless application development.
Comparison; OpenShift, vs Kubernetes
1. Installation and Setup:
Kubernetes can be set up manually. Using tools such as kubeadm, Minikube or Kubespray.
OpenShift offers an installer that simplifies the setup process for complex enterprise environments.
2. User Interface:
Kubernetes primarily relies on the command line interface although it does provide a web based dashboard.
OpenShift features a comprehensive and user-friendly web console.
3. Security:
Kubernetes provides security features and relies on third party tools for advanced security requirements.
OpenShift offers enhanced security with built in features like Security Enhanced Linux (SELinux) and stricter default policies.
4. CI/CD Integration:
Kubernetes requires tools for CI/CD integration.
OpenShift has an integrated CI/CD pipeline making it more convenient for DevOps practices.
5. Pricing:
Kubernetes is open source. Requires investment in infrastructure and expertise.
OpenShift is a product with subscription based pricing.
6. Community and Support;
Kubernetes has a community, with support.
OpenShift is backed by Red Hat with enterprise level support.
7. Extensibility:
Kubernetes: It has an ecosystem of plugins and add ons making it highly adaptable.
OpenShift:It builds upon Kubernetes. Brings its own set of tools and features.
Use Cases
Kubernetes:
It is well suited for organizations seeking a container orchestration platform, with community support.
It works best for businesses that possess the technical know-how to effectively manage and scale Kubernetes clusters.
OpenShift:
It serves as a choice for enterprises that require a container solution accompanied by integrated developer tools and enhanced security measures.
Particularly favored by regulated industries like finance and healthcare where security and compliance are of utmost importance.
Conclusion
Both Kubernetes and OpenShift offer capabilities for container orchestration. While Kubernetes offers flexibility along with a community, OpenShift presents an integrated enterprise-ready solution. Upgrading Kubernetes from version 1.21 to 1.22 involves upgrading the control plane and worker nodes separately. By following the steps outlined in this guide, you can ensure a smooth and error-free upgrade process. The selection between the two depends on the requirements, expertise, and organizational context.
Example Code Snippet: Deploying an App on Kubernetes
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: myapp-pod
labels:
app: myapp
spec:
containers:
- name: myapp-container
image: myapp:1.0This YAML file is an example of deploying a simple application on Kubernetes. It defines a Pod with a single container running ‘myapp’.
In conclusion, both OpenShift vs Kubernetes offer robust solutions for container orchestration, each with its unique strengths and use cases. The choice between them should be based on organizational requirements, infrastructure, and the level of desired security and integration.
Do you like to read more educational content? Read our blogs at Cloudastra Technologies or contact us for business enquiry at Cloudastra Contact Us.