Introduction to Virtual Threads in Java: JEP 425
Java Enhancement Proposal (JEP) No. 425 introduces virtual threads, a lightweight concurrency feature that enhances Java’s performance and scalability. Available in JDK 19 as a preview feature, virtual threads will soon become a permanent part of future Java releases.
It significantly reduce the effort needed to write, maintain, and observe high-throughput applications. This article explores their goals and impact on Java’s concurrency model.
Goals of JEP 425
1. Scaling Server Applications Efficiently
The primary goal of JEP 425 is to enable server applications to scale efficiently using a thread-per-request model. In this approach, each HTTP request or database transaction is handled by a separate thread, simplifying development.
However, traditional Java threads, known as platform threads, are expensive. Each platform thread reserves around 20MB of memory and takes approximately 1 millisecond to launch. Let’s analyze this cost with an example:
– Given 16GB of available memory, only 800 platform threads can be created.
– If these threads are mostly idle, such as waiting for network responses, CPU utilization remains extremely low.
– Even doubling memory to 32GB only increases CPU usage slightly, making platform threads inefficient for large-scale applications.
To achieve 90% CPU utilization, 90,000 threads would be required—consuming 1.8TB of memory and taking 90 seconds to launch. Clearly, platform threads do not optimize hardware usage effectively. Virtual threads solve this issue by being lightweight and significantly reducing resource consumption.
2. Seamless Adoption
JEP 425 ensures that existing Java applications using platform threads can transition to virtual threads with minimal code changes. The benefits include:
– Same Java and native code compatibility: No need to learn new paradigms.
– Lower costs: Virtual threads are 1,000 times cheaper than platform threads.
– No need for thread pooling: Since virtual threads are cheap, creating them on demand is better than managing a pool.
3. Maintaining Compatibility with Java’s Threading Model
It integrate smoothly into Java’s existing concurrency model. Some key behaviors include:
– Thread-local variables function the same way as in platform threads.
– Synchronization mechanisms remain intact, but caution is needed with synchronized blocks. If a virtual thread enters a long-running synchronized block, it blocks the underlying platform thread. A better approach is to replace synchronization with ReentrantLock APIs for better performance.
Virtual Threads vs. Reactive Programming
Reactive programming offers another way to improve concurrency by using event-driven, non-blocking execution. However, this approach demands a paradigm shift in development, making it harder to learn, debug, and test.
Where as Virtual threads provide similar performance benefits without requiring new learning. Developers can continue writing traditional blocking code without performance penalties.
Conclusion
Virtual threads revolutionize Java concurrency by providing an efficient, scalable, and developer-friendly alternative to platform threads. Unlike reactive programming, which requires a shift in coding styles, virtual threads allow seamless adoption while improving performance.
For developers comparing Java vs. JavaScript, virtual threads reinforce Java’s strength in handling large-scale, concurrent applications, making it a more suitable choice for enterprise-grade back-end development.
Do you like to read more educational content? Read our blogs at Cloudastra Technologies or contact us for business enquiry at Cloudastra Contact Us.